What is the difference between a mass tort and a class action?

In a class action (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23), all class members are bound by the same judgment and receive identical or formulaic compensation. In a mass tort/MDL (28 U.S.C. §1407), each plaintiff's case is individually evaluated — your unique diagnosis, treatment history, severity, and damages determine your personal compensation. Mass torts typically produce higher per-plaintiff recoveries because they account for individual differences in injury severity, causation strength, and economic loss.

How do I know if I qualify for a mass tort case?

Eligibility depends on: (1) documented exposure to the product/substance (prescriptions, medical records, employment history), (2) a qualifying diagnosis consistent with known injuries caused by the product, and (3) temporal plausibility linking exposure to injury onset. We evaluate your exposure history, medical records, and the current state of litigation to determine eligibility and estimate case value.

How long do mass tort cases take?

MDL proceedings typically take 2-5 years from consolidation through global settlement. The timeline includes: case-specific discovery (6-12 months), general/specific causation Daubert hearings (6-12 months), bellwether trial selections and preparations (6-12 months), bellwether verdicts (which set settlement benchmarks), and global settlement negotiations. Early resolution tracks may be available for the most severely injured plaintiffs.

What is a multidistrict litigation (MDL)?

An MDL under 28 U.S.C. §1407 consolidates similar federal lawsuits from across the country before a single federal judge (the transferee judge) for coordinated pre-trial proceedings — including discovery, Daubert hearings, and bellwether trials. This prevents duplicative litigation while preserving each plaintiff's individual claims. Cases that don't settle may be remanded to their original district courts for individual trial. The JPML (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation) decides whether to create an MDL and selects the transferee court.

Do I have to go to court?

In most MDL proceedings, individual plaintiffs do not need to appear in court. Bellwether trials use representative cases selected through negotiation between plaintiffs' and defendants' counsel. If your case is selected as a bellwether, we prepare you thoroughly with mock testimony and trial preparation. The vast majority of mass tort cases resolve through global settlement frameworks negotiated after bellwether trial outcomes establish case values.

What compensation can I receive?

Individual compensation in mass tort settlements is determined by a claims grid or matrix that scores your case based on: injury diagnosis and severity tier, duration and cost of treatment, age and life expectancy, lost wages and earning capacity, and additional qualifying factors. Higher-tier injuries (cancer, organ failure, death) receive proportionally larger awards. Punitive damages, when awarded in bellwether trials, enhance overall settlement fund values. Every case is unique — past results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Can I join a mass tort if I'm already treating with a doctor?

Yes — in fact, existing documented medical treatment strengthens your claim by establishing a contemporaneous record of diagnosis and treatment. We work with your existing treating physicians and may recommend additional evaluations by specialists who can provide opinions on specific causation (differential diagnosis) linking the product to your injuries.

What are current mass tort cases Bond Legal is handling?

We are actively evaluating cases involving PFAS contamination (AFFF firefighting foam, contaminated water), Roundup/glyphosate (non-Hodgkin lymphoma), Camp Lejeune water contamination (under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022), defective hip and knee implants (metallosis, revision surgery), transvaginal mesh (erosion, chronic pain), hair relaxer products (uterine/ovarian cancer), and various pharmaceutical injuries. Contact us to see if your situation qualifies.

All Practice Areas

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug Lawyers

Last Updated: February 2026

When corporations prioritize profits over people, thousands suffer. We have the resources, the experience, and the determination to work to work to hold them accountable for the harm they've caused.

See What Your Case Is Worth Send Us a Message

Legal Summary — Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug Lawyers

Last Updated: February 2026

Mass tort litigation involves dangerous drugs, defective medical devices, and toxic exposure claims consolidated under multidistrict litigation (MDL) for pretrial efficiency. Unlike class actions, each plaintiff maintains an individual claim with separate damages. Bond Legal evaluates eligibility for active MDLs including PFAS contamination, defective hip implants, and recalled pharmaceuticals, connecting clients to specialized litigation teams.

This summary is AI-generated and for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and the reader is urged to verify the factual accuracy of the statements made. Bond Legal LLC (866) 423-7724

$100B+

In mass tort settlements over the past decade

2M+

Americans harmed by recalled drugs & devices annually

700K+

Lawsuits pending in federal MDL proceedings

Billions

Paid by companies like Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, 3M, and Purdue Pharma

Overview

Every year, pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and chemical corporations market products they know — or should know — are dangerous. Mass tort litigation is the civil enforcement mechanism that holds them accountable. Unlike individual lawsuits, mass torts leverage the procedural efficiency of multidistrict litigation (MDL) under 28 U.S.C. §1407 — consolidating thousands of cases before a single federal judge for coordinated pre-trial proceedings while preserving each plaintiff's individual claims, injuries, and damage calculations.

The distinction between mass torts and class actions is critical. In a class action (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23), all class members receive identical treatment and compensation. In mass tort/MDL proceedings, each plaintiff's unique injuries are individually evaluated — your specific diagnosis, treatment history, and damages determine your recovery. This individualized approach typically yields significantly higher per-plaintiff recoveries than class action distributions.

MDL proceedings follow a structured litigation framework: coordinated discovery (including production of corporate internal documents under Protective Orders), Daubert hearings on expert admissibility (particularly for general and specific causation testimony), bellwether trial selections (representative cases tried to verdict that establish case values and settlement benchmarks), and global settlement negotiations based on bellwether outcomes. Bond Legal has the resources to fund complex, multi-year litigation against Fortune 500 defendants and provide each client with personalized case management throughout.

Understanding Your Rights

Types of Cases We Handle

Every situation is unique. Select a category below to learn about the specific legal theories, key statutes, and how Bond Legal can help.

Jurisdiction-Specific

State-by-State Legal Guide

Laws vary dramatically by state. Select your state to see the specific statutes, deadlines, and legal nuances that apply to your case.

California Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 1975)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (CCP §335.1)

CCP §335.1 — 2-year general SOL (but discovery rule applies)

Civil Code §3294 — Uncapped punitive damages

Coordination proceedings under CCP §404

California is a primary MDL/coordination venue for mass torts

Uncapped punitive damages make CA filings attractive

Discovery rule extends SOL for latent injury cases (toxic exposure)

Texas Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §33.001)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §16.003)

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §16.003 — 2-year SOL

Multidistrict litigation procedures available in Texas state courts

Texas is a major mass tort filing venue, particularly for toxic exposure and pharmaceutical cases

Punitive damages capped

Florida Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (HB 837, effective 2023)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (reduced from 4 years by HB 837)

Fla. Stat. §95.11 — SOL varies by claim type (2 years for negligence, 4 years for products liability)

Fla. Stat. §768.72 — Punitive damages: financial worth discovery permitted; 3× compensatory cap (4× for intentional misconduct)

HB 837 (2023) — 51% comparative negligence bar and reduced SOL affect mass tort case valuations

Florida is a significant mass tort venue, particularly for pharmaceutical and medical device cases

HB 837 changes significantly affect mass tort case valuations and settlement dynamics

South Florida federal courts handle substantial MDL dockets

New York Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (CPLR §1411)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (CPLR §214)

CPLR §214 — 3-year SOL

No cap on damages

NYC is a major MDL and mass tort venue

No damage caps — favorable for mass tort plaintiffs

Alabama Laws

Negligence System: Contributory Negligence (one of only 4 states) (Ala. Code §6-5-580)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Ala. Code §6-2-38)

Ala. Code §6-2-38 — 2-year SOL

Contributory negligence complicates mass tort cases

Arkansas Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Ark. Code §16-64-122)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (Ark. Code §16-56-105)

Ark. Code §16-56-105 — 3-year SOL

Limited mass tort venue use

Colorado Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (C.R.S. §13-21-111)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (C.R.S. §13-80-101)

C.R.S. §13-80-101 — 3-year SOL

Non-economic damages cap affects mass tort valuations

Georgia Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (O.C.G.A. §51-12-33)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (O.C.G.A. §9-3-33)

O.C.G.A. §9-3-33 — 2-year SOL

Georgia is a growing mass tort venue, particularly for pharmaceutical cases

Hawaii Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (HRS §663-31)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (HRS §657-7)

HRS §657-7 — 2-year SOL

Military base contamination cases are significant in Hawaii

Illinois Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (735 ILCS 5/2-1116)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (735 ILCS 5/13-202)

735 ILCS 5/13-202 — 2-year SOL

No cap on damages

Madison County, IL is one of the most active mass tort venues in the nation

Iowa Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Iowa Code §668.3)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Iowa Code §614.1(2))

Iowa Code §614.1 — 2-year SOL

Agricultural chemical exposure cases

Louisiana Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (La. C.C. art. 2323)

Statute of Limitations: 1 year prescriptive period (La. C.C. art. 3492) — SHORTEST in the nation

La. C.C. art. 3492 — 1-year prescriptive period

1-YEAR deadline

Petrochemical industry toxic exposure cases are significant

Michigan Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (MCL §600.2959)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (MCL §600.5805)

MCL §600.5805 — 3-year SOL

Flint water crisis established major mass tort precedent

Minnesota Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Minn. Stat. §604.01)

Statute of Limitations: 6 years from date of accident (Minn. Stat. §541.05) — LONGEST in the nation

Minn. Stat. §541.05 — 6-year SOL

6-year SOL provides extended time for discovery-rule claims

Mississippi Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (Miss. Code §11-7-15)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (Miss. Code §15-1-49)

Miss. Code §15-1-49 — 3-year SOL

Mississippi has historically been an active mass tort venue

Missouri Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (Mo. Rev. Stat. §537.765)

Statute of Limitations: 5 years from date of accident (Mo. Rev. Stat. §516.120)

Mo. Rev. Stat. §516.120 — 5-year SOL

St. Louis is a major mass tort venue

No damage caps

Montana Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (MCA §27-1-702)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (MCA §27-2-204)

MCA §27-2-204 — 3-year SOL

Asbestos litigation from Libby, MT is nationally significant

New Mexico Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (N.M. Stat. Ann. §41-3A-1)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (N.M. Stat. Ann. §37-1-8)

N.M. Stat. §37-1-8 — 3-year SOL

Nuclear waste and military base contamination cases

North Carolina Laws

Negligence System: Contributory Negligence (N.C. Gen. Stat. §1-139) — one of only 4 states

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (N.C. Gen. Stat. §1-52)

N.C. Gen. Stat. §1-52 — 3-year SOL

Camp Lejeune water contamination litigation (PACT Act) is nationally significant

Ohio Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Ohio Rev. Code §2315.33)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Ohio Rev. Code §2305.10)

Ohio Rev. Code §2305.10 — 2-year SOL

Ohio is a significant mass tort venue

Oklahoma Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Okla. Stat. §23-13)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Okla. Stat. §12-95)

Okla. Stat. §12-95 — 2-year SOL

Oil and gas industry toxic exposure cases

Oregon Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (ORS §31.600)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (ORS §12.110)

ORS §12.110 — 2-year SOL

Environmental contamination cases in Portland area

South Carolina Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (S.C. Code §15-38-15)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (S.C. Code §15-3-530)

S.C. Code §15-3-530 — 3-year SOL

Camp Lejeune litigation has SC connections

Tennessee Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Tenn. Code §29-11-103)

Statute of Limitations: 1 year from date of accident (Tenn. Code §28-3-104) — SECOND SHORTEST in the nation

Tenn. Code §28-3-104 — 1-year SOL

1-YEAR SOL — critical deadline

Utah Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Utah Code §78B-5-818)

Statute of Limitations: 4 years from date of accident (Utah Code §78B-2-307)

Utah Code §78B-2-307 — 4-year SOL

Military and mining contamination cases

Washington Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (RCW §4.22.005)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (RCW §4.16.080)

RCW §4.16.080 — 3-year SOL

No cap on damages

Hanford nuclear site contamination is nationally significant

West Virginia Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (W. Va. Code §55-7-13a)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (W. Va. Code §55-2-12)

W. Va. Code §55-2-12 — 2-year SOL

Chemical industry toxic exposure (Charleston area)

Wisconsin Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (Wis. Stat. §895.045)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (Wis. Stat. §893.54)

Wis. Stat. §893.54 — 3-year SOL

PFAS contamination litigation growing in Wisconsin

* State laws change frequently. Information current as of February 2026. This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contact Bond Legal at (866) 423-7724 for a free case evaluation specific to your state and circumstances.

Step-by-Step Guide

What To Do Right Now

Stop using the product if safe to do so

If you suspect a drug or device is causing harm, consult your doctor before stopping. For some medications, abrupt discontinuation can be dangerous.

Document your usage and symptoms

Record what product you used, when you started, what symptoms you experienced, and when they began. Save packaging, prescriptions, and medical records.

Seek medical evaluation

Get a thorough medical evaluation to document your injuries and establish the connection between the product and your health issues.

Check for recalls and warnings

Search the FDA's recall database, the CPSC website, and news sources for recalls, warnings, or ongoing litigation related to the product.

Do not discard the product

The actual product (or its packaging, lot numbers, and receipts) is critical evidence. Preserve it in a safe location.

Contact Bond Legal for a free mass tort evaluation

We'll review your exposure, symptoms, and eligibility for ongoing mass tort litigation — and handle everything from there.

Without an Attorney vs. With Bond Legal

See why hiring an attorney makes all the difference.

Without an Attorney

✗No recourse against corporate defendants
✗Medical costs paid out of pocket
✗Long-term health effects uncompensated
✗Corporation faces no accountability
✗You're alone against a Fortune 500 company

With Bond Legal

Join thousands of plaintiffs with collective power against corporations
Compensation for all medical expenses, past and future
Damages for chronic conditions, disability, and reduced quality of life
Punitive damages deter future corporate misconduct
Resources and litigation network to challenge the largest corporations

Types of Injuries & Damages

Organ Damage & Failure

Hepatotoxic drugs cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) graded on the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) scale. Nephrotoxic substances cause acute kidney injury (AKI) staged by KDIGO criteria. Cardiotoxic drugs cause QT prolongation, cardiomyopathy, and heart failure assessed by ejection fraction on echocardiography. Specific causation linking the product to organ damage is established through differential diagnosis methodology.

Cancer

Carcinogenic substances like PFAS ('forever chemicals'), glyphosate (Roundup), talc (contaminated with asbestos), and benzene have been linked to cancers including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and leukemia. General causation (can the product cause this cancer?) is established through epidemiological studies, relative risk ratios, and Bradford Hill criteria. Specific causation (did it cause THIS plaintiff's cancer?) requires differential diagnosis by a qualified oncologist or toxicologist.

Neurological Damage

Neurotoxic exposures cause peripheral neuropathy (diagnosed by nerve conduction studies/EMG), cognitive decline (documented by neuropsychological testing — WAIS-IV, Trail Making), Parkinsonism, and movement disorders. Toxic encephalopathy from chronic chemical exposure produces measurable deficits on neuroimaging (MRI volumetric analysis) and neuropsychological batteries.

Surgical Complications

Defective medical devices — metal-on-metal hip implants (causing metallosis and pseudotumor formation), transvaginal mesh (causing erosion, organ perforation, and chronic pain), and IVC filters (causing migration, fracture, and vessel perforation) — require revision surgery with significantly higher complication rates. Product liability claims proceed under strict liability (design defect and failure to warn) and negligent design theories. FDA 510(k) clearance does not preempt state tort claims under Medtronic v. Lohr.

Birth Defects

Teratogenic drugs (exposure during organogenesis, weeks 3-8 of gestation) can cause congenital malformations. Specific causation requires temporal correlation between exposure and the critical window of organ development, supported by animal teratology studies and epidemiological data. Claims proceed under failure-to-warn theories, as adequate labeling of reproductive risks is required under FDA Pregnancy Category classifications (now replaced by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule).

Wrongful Death

When dangerous drugs, devices, or toxic exposures cause death, both wrongful death claims (statutory beneficiaries recovering loss of companionship, pecuniary loss) and survival actions (estate recovering pre-death pain and suffering) are pursued. In mass tort litigation, wrongful death bellwether cases typically command the highest settlement values and are prioritized for early resolution.

Common Cases We Handle

Dangerous and recalled pharmaceutical drugs
Defective medical devices (hip implants, surgical mesh, IVC filters)
Toxic chemical exposure (PFAS, Roundup, Camp Lejeune water contamination)
Contaminated consumer products
Defective automotive parts and recalls
Environmental contamination claims
Talcum powder and ovarian cancer litigation
Opioid-related claims
Firefighter foam (AFFF) PFAS exposure
Contaminated food and water supply

Why Choose Bond Legal

Resources to fund complex, years-long litigation against Fortune 500 companies
Personalized attention within large-scale litigation — you're never 'just a number'
Connected with leading mass tort litigation networks nationwide
Regular case updates and dedicated case managers
Track record in major mass tort litigations
Pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you

Your Legal Journey

Our Proven Process

Free Case Evaluation

We review your product exposure, medical history, and symptoms to determine your eligibility for mass tort litigation.

Case Filing & MDL Assignment

Your case is filed and consolidated with similar claims in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceeding for efficient management.

Discovery & Expert Development

We participate in coordinated discovery against the corporate defendant, uncovering internal documents, studies, and communications.

Bellwether Trials

Representative cases go to trial first. Verdicts in these 'bellwether' trials set the tone for global settlement negotiations.

Settlement Negotiation

Based on bellwether results and evidence, global settlement frameworks are negotiated. Your individual damages are evaluated within the framework.

Individual Resolution

Your specific injuries, damages, and circumstances determine your individual settlement amount. We negotiate to pursue your full recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions

In-Depth Legal Guides

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug Guides by State

Explore our comprehensive state-specific guides covering local laws, filing deadlines, insurance rules, and step-by-step claims processes.

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in California

Legal guide — 2 years from date of injury SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Texas

Legal guide — 2 years from date of injury SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Alabama

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Arkansas

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Colorado

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Florida

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Georgia

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Hawaii

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Illinois

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Iowa

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Louisiana

Legal guide — 1 year SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Michigan

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Minnesota

Legal guide — 6 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Mississippi

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Missouri

Legal guide — 5 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Montana

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in New Mexico

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in New York

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in North Carolina

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Ohio

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Oklahoma

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Oregon

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in South Carolina

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Tennessee

Legal guide — 1 year SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Utah

Legal guide — 4 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Washington

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in West Virginia

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug in Wisconsin

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

View All Legal Guides

Injured? Find Out What You're Owed.

You pay nothing unless we win. Contact Bond Legal now and let us advocate for you.

Call Now — It's Free Submit Your Case Online

Other Practice Areas

Auto Accident Attorneys

Injured in a car accident? Bond Legal auto accident attorneys pursue full and fair compensation. Free case review — pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Call 24/7.

Learn More

Truck Accident Lawyers

Seriously injured in a truck accident? Bond Legal handles 18-wheeler and commercial vehicle cases nationwide. We take on trucking companies. Free consultation.

Learn More

Motorcycle Accident Attorneys

Injured in a motorcycle crash? Bond Legal challenges rider bias and pursues full compensation for motorcyclists. Free case review — pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you.

Learn More

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. All case results shown are gross amounts recovered before deduction of attorney fees, costs, and expenses. Net amounts to the client may be less. The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its own merits. Responsible Attorney: Candice Bond, 17500 Red Hill Ave. #100, Irvine, CA 92614. Pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you.

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug Lawyers

Overview

Types of Cases We Handle

Roundup/Glyphosate & Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Roundup/Glyphosate & Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Talcum Powder & Ovarian Cancer Litigation

Talcum Powder & Ovarian Cancer Litigation

Toxic Exposure & PFAS 'Forever Chemicals'

Toxic Exposure & PFAS 'Forever Chemicals'

MDL vs. Class Action: Understanding Your Options

MDL vs. Class Action: Understanding Your Options

Defective Medical Devices: Hip Implants, Surgical Mesh & IVC Filters

Defective Medical Devices: Hip Implants, Surgical Mesh & IVC Filters

Bellwether Trials & How Settlement Values Are Determined

Bellwether Trials & How Settlement Values Are Determined

State-by-State Legal Guide

What To Do Right Now

Stop using the product if safe to do so

Document your usage and symptoms

Seek medical evaluation

Check for recalls and warnings

Do not discard the product

Contact Bond Legal for a free mass tort evaluation

Without an Attorney vs. With Bond Legal

Without an Attorney

With Bond Legal

Types of Injuries & Damages

Organ Damage & Failure

Cancer

Neurological Damage

Surgical Complications

Birth Defects

Wrongful Death

Common Cases We Handle

Why Choose Bond Legal

Our Proven Process

Free Case Evaluation

Case Filing & MDL Assignment

Discovery & Expert Development

Bellwether Trials

Settlement Negotiation

Individual Resolution

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a mass tort and a class action?

How do I know if I qualify for a mass tort case?

How long do mass tort cases take?

What is a multidistrict litigation (MDL)?

Do I have to go to court?

What compensation can I receive?

Can I join a mass tort if I'm already treating with a doctor?

What are current mass tort cases Bond Legal is handling?

Mass Tort & Dangerous Drug Guides by State

Injured? Find Out What You're Owed.

Other Practice Areas

Auto Accident Attorneys

Truck Accident Lawyers

Motorcycle Accident Attorneys