How do e-bike classification laws affect my accident case?

Most states have adopted a three-tier e-bike classification system — Class 1 (pedal-assist to 20 mph), Class 2 (throttle-assist to 20 mph), and Class 3 (pedal-assist to 28 mph) — each with distinct operating rules. States like California (SB 1271), New York, Colorado, and Texas have codified these tiers. If you were riding legally within your classification, the motorist bears full liability under a negligence per se analysis. If you exceeded your class's speed limit, comparative fault may reduce — but generally cannot eliminate — your recovery. We download the e-bike's onboard controller data and GPS telemetry to establish actual speed at impact.

What is a dooring accident and who is liable?

A dooring accident occurs when a vehicle occupant opens a door into the 'door zone' — the approximately 4-foot strip adjacent to parked vehicles — striking a passing cyclist. Many states have specific anti-dooring statutes (California CVC §22517, Illinois 625 ILCS 5/11-1407, Oregon ORS 811.490) creating a statutory duty: opening a door on the traffic side when unsafe constitutes negligence per se. We use perception-reaction time (PRT) models and stopping-distance calculations to demonstrate the cyclist had no reasonable opportunity to avoid the collision, defeating any contributory fault argument.

Do I have to wear a helmet while cycling?

Helmet laws vary by state. Most states require helmets for riders under 16-18 years old but not adults on traditional bicycles. For e-bikes, many states require Class 3 riders to wear helmets regardless of age. Critically, non-use of a helmet does NOT bar your claim under comparative negligence frameworks in most states, but insurers may argue it as a contributing factor to head injuries — a defense we counter with biomechanical testimony on whether the helmet would have mitigated the specific injury mechanism (rotational vs. translational forces).

All Practice Areas

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident Lawyers

Last Updated: February 2026

E-bike laws are changing rapidly across the country, reshaping liability rules for riders. Whether you ride a traditional bicycle or an e-bike, we pursue riders' rights.

See What Your Case Is Worth Send Us a Message

Legal Summary — Bicycle & E-Bike Accident Lawyers

Last Updated: February 2026

Cyclists and e-bike riders are classified as vulnerable road users under most state traffic codes, entitling them to heightened protections. Common accident scenarios include dooring, right-hook collisions at intersections, and bike lane intrusions. Many states have specific anti-dooring statutes imposing liability on vehicle occupants. E-bike classification (Class 1, 2, or 3) affects liability and insurance coverage. Bond Legal handles bicycle and e-bike injury claims involving TBI, fractures, and road rash.

This summary is AI-generated and for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and the reader is urged to verify the factual accuracy of the statements made. Bond Legal LLC (866) 423-7724

1,105+

Cyclists killed nationwide annually (NHTSA)

240%

Increase in e-bike sales (2019-2024)

49 States

Have adopted safe passing distance laws for cyclists

3-Tier

E-bike classification system adopted by most states

Overview

Bicycle and e-bike accidents are surging across the United States. The nation consistently records over 1,000 cyclist fatalities annually under the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), with states like California, Florida, and Texas leading in cyclist deaths. The explosion of e-bike popularity — sales increased over 240% from 2019 to 2024 — has created a new category of complex accident cases governed by evolving state classifications. Liability analysis in cyclist cases requires understanding the 'vulnerable road user' doctrine, state-specific safe passing distance laws (e.g., 3-foot laws in California, Florida, Texas, and Colorado; 4-foot laws in Michigan and Pennsylvania), and the biomechanics of rider ejection — including primary vs. secondary impact kinematics, throw-distance equations, and ground-contact deceleration forces that distinguish low-speed falls from high-energy vehicular impacts.

States are rapidly updating their e-bike regulations. Many have adopted a three-tier classification system — Class 1 (pedal-assist, 20 mph), Class 2 (throttle-assist, 20 mph), and Class 3 (pedal-assist, 28 mph) — each with distinct operating rules regarding bike lane access, age requirements, and helmet mandates. In California, SB 1271 (effective 2025) reclassified e-bikes under these tiers; similar frameworks exist in New York, Colorado, Texas, and Florida. These classifications directly affect negligence per se analysis: a Class 3 rider exceeding 28 mph on a multi-use path may face contributory fault under comparative negligence systems. Insurance adjusters exploit classification confusion to invoke assumption of risk and contributory negligence defenses. We counter with speed-at-impact analysis using GPS telemetry from the e-bike's onboard controller data and event data recorder (EDR) downloads.

Dooring accidents — where a motorist opens a car door into the path of a cyclist — constitute one of the most common collision modes in the 'door zone' (the 4-foot strip adjacent to parked vehicles). Many states have specific anti-dooring statutes (e.g., California CVC §22517, Illinois 625 ILCS 5/11-1407, Oregon ORS 811.490) that make opening a door on the traffic side negligence per se. We employ sight-line analysis and perception-reaction time (PRT) models to demonstrate that the cyclist had insufficient stopping distance. In severe dooring cases, we retain biomechanical engineers to correlate handlebar-impact forces with specific injury patterns such as Lisfranc fractures, AC joint separations, and contrecoup brain injuries from secondary ground impact.

Understanding Your Rights

Types of Cases We Handle

Every situation is unique. Select a category below to learn about the specific legal theories, key statutes, and how Bond Legal can help.

Jurisdiction-Specific

State-by-State Legal Guide

Laws vary dramatically by state. Select your state to see the specific statutes, deadlines, and legal nuances that apply to your case.

California Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 1975)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (CCP §335.1)

CVC §21760 — Three Feet for Safety Act: drivers must give cyclists 3 ft passing distance

CVC §22517 — Anti-dooring statute: negligence per se for opening door into traffic unsafely

SB 1271 (2025) — Reclassified e-bikes into Class 1/2/3 tiers with distinct rules

CVC §21212 — Helmet required for riders under 18; adults exempt on traditional bikes

CVC §21200 — Cyclists have same rights and duties as motorists

California consistently ranks top 3 nationally for cyclist fatalities (200+ annually per FARS)

Class 3 e-bike riders must wear helmets regardless of age under SB 1271

Lane splitting is legal for motorcycles (CVC §21658.1) but NOT for bicycles

Texas Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §33.001)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §16.003)

Tex. Transp. Code §545.053 — Safe passing distance required for commercial vehicles

Tex. Transp. Code §551.101 — Cyclists have same rights as motorists

HB 1068 (2021) — Vulnerable road user law: enhanced penalties for drivers who injure/kill cyclists

No statewide mandatory 3-ft passing law for non-commercial vehicles

Texas has no statewide mandatory helmet law for adult cyclists

Vulnerable road user law provides enhanced criminal penalties but not civil liability changes

Florida Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (HB 837, effective 2023)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (reduced from 4 years by HB 837)

Fla. Stat. §316.083 — Drivers must maintain 3 ft minimum passing distance for cyclists

Fla. Stat. §316.2065 — Comprehensive bicycle regulations including lighting requirements

Fla. Stat. §316.2065(3)(e) — Cyclists may take full lane when lane is too narrow to share

Florida is consistently #1 or #2 for cyclist fatalities nationally (180+ annually)

No mandatory helmet law for adults on bicycles or e-bikes

PIP ($10,000 no-fault benefits) available for cyclist injuries if rider has auto insurance

New York Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (CPLR §1411)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (CPLR §214)

VTL §1122-a — Drivers must pass cyclists at a safe distance

VTL §1238 — Dooring statute: unlawful to open door into moving traffic

2020 E-Bike Law — Legalized Class 1/2/3 e-bikes statewide

VTL §1236 — Bicycle helmet required for riders under 14

NYC has extensive protected bike lane infrastructure and Vision Zero enforcement

No-fault (PIP) state — $50,000 in first-party benefits available

Serious injury threshold must be met to sue for non-economic damages

Alabama Laws

Negligence System: Contributory Negligence (one of only 4 states) (Ala. Code §6-5-580)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Ala. Code §6-2-38)

Ala. Code §32-5A-263 — Cyclists must ride as near right as practicable

No statewide 3-foot passing law enacted (legislation introduced but not passed)

Contributory negligence makes bicycle cases extremely difficult — any cyclist fault bars recovery

No mandatory helmet law for any age

Limited bicycle infrastructure in most Alabama cities

Arkansas Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Ark. Code §16-64-122)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (Ark. Code §16-56-105)

Ark. Code §27-51-311 — Drivers must pass cyclists at safe distance

Ark. Code §27-51-1802 — 3-foot minimum passing distance (2007 law)

3-foot passing law enacted in 2007

No mandatory helmet law for cyclists of any age

Rural roads with limited shoulders create challenging cycling conditions

Colorado Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (C.R.S. §13-21-111)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (C.R.S. §13-80-101)

C.R.S. §42-4-1003 — 3-foot safe passing distance required

HB 22-1028 (2022) — 'Safety Stop' law: cyclists may treat stop signs as yields

C.R.S. §42-4-221 — Cyclists may ride two abreast in a single lane

Safety Stop law allows cyclists to yield at stop signs rather than fully stopping

E-bikes allowed on most bike paths unless locally restricted

Colorado has specific trail-access rules for Class 3 e-bikes

Georgia Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (O.C.G.A. §51-12-33)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (O.C.G.A. §9-3-33)

O.C.G.A. §40-6-294 — 3-foot minimum passing distance required

O.C.G.A. §40-6-296 — Cyclists may take full lane when lane is substandard width

3-foot passing law provides clear negligence per se standard

No mandatory helmet law for adult cyclists

Atlanta BeltLine creates growing but sometimes conflicting cyclist/pedestrian traffic

Hawaii Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (HRS §663-31)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (HRS §657-7)

HRS §291C-142 — Drivers must give 3 feet clearance when passing cyclists

HRS §291C-150 — Cyclists under 16 must wear helmets

3-foot passing law applies statewide

Island roads with limited shoulders create challenging cycling conditions

Tourism-related cyclist injuries may involve rental companies

Illinois Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (735 ILCS 5/2-1116)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (735 ILCS 5/13-202)

625 ILCS 5/11-703 — Drivers must give 3 feet when passing cyclists

Dennis Burke Law (2019) — Enhanced penalties for motorists who injure/kill vulnerable road users

Chicago has extensive bike lane network and Divvy bike-share system

Dennis Burke Law creates enhanced penalties for injuring cyclists

No damage caps — favorable for catastrophic bicycle injury claims

Iowa Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Iowa Code §668.3)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Iowa Code §614.1(2))

Iowa Code §321.281 — Drivers must give at least 3 feet when passing cyclists

RAGBRAI creates massive annual cycling traffic across Iowa

3-foot passing law provides clear standard

Rural road cycling is common but infrastructure limited

Louisiana Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (La. C.C. art. 2323)

Statute of Limitations: 1 year prescriptive period (La. C.C. art. 3492) — SHORTEST in the nation

La. R.S. §32:76.1 — 3-foot minimum passing distance

La. R.S. §32:197 — Cyclist rights and duties on roadways

1-YEAR prescriptive period — critical to file immediately

3-foot passing law applies statewide

No mandatory helmet law for adult cyclists

Michigan Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (MCL §600.2959)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (MCL §600.5805)

MCL §257.660 — 5 ft passing distance when speed limit >45 mph (most protective in the U.S.)

MCL §257.660c — E-bike classification and regulation

MCL §257.658 — Cyclists must ride as near right as practicable with exceptions

Michigan has one of the strongest passing laws in America — 5 feet when speed limit >45 mph

No-fault PIP benefits available for cyclist injuries caused by motor vehicles

No mandatory helmet law for adult cyclists

Minnesota Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Minn. Stat. §604.01)

Statute of Limitations: 6 years from date of accident (Minn. Stat. §541.05) — LONGEST in the nation

Minn. Stat. §169.18 — 3-foot minimum passing distance

Minn. Stat. §169.222 — Comprehensive bicycle regulations

Minneapolis consistently ranks as one of America's most bike-friendly cities

6-year SOL provides extended time for bicycle injury claims

No mandatory helmet law for any age

Mississippi Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (Miss. Code §11-7-15)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (Miss. Code §15-1-49)

Miss. Code §63-3-1309 — 3-foot minimum passing distance (2010 law)

3-foot passing law enacted 2010

Limited bicycle infrastructure outside university communities

Pure comparative negligence helps cyclists with shared-fault situations

Missouri Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (Mo. Rev. Stat. §537.765)

Statute of Limitations: 5 years from date of accident (Mo. Rev. Stat. §516.120)

No statewide 3-foot passing law (some municipalities have local ordinances)

Mo. Rev. Stat. §307.188 — Bicycle lighting requirements

Missouri has NO statewide safe passing distance law — rely on 'safe distance' standard

5-year SOL provides extended time for bicycle cases

No damage caps — favorable for severe cyclist injuries

Montana Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (MCA §27-1-702)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (MCA §27-2-204)

MCA §61-8-605 — 3-foot minimum passing distance

3-foot passing law applies statewide

Long rural highways with limited shoulders create hazardous cycling conditions

No mandatory helmet law for any age

New Mexico Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (N.M. Stat. Ann. §41-3A-1)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (N.M. Stat. Ann. §37-1-8)

N.M. Stat. §66-3-705 — Safe passing distance required (no specific footage)

No specific 3-foot requirement — 'safe distance' standard applies

Pure comparative negligence helps cyclists with shared fault

High altitude sun glare can be a contributing factor in cycling crashes

North Carolina Laws

Negligence System: Contributory Negligence (N.C. Gen. Stat. §1-139) — one of only 4 states

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (N.C. Gen. Stat. §1-52)

N.C. Gen. Stat. §20-149 — 2-foot minimum passing distance for cyclists

Only 2-foot passing distance — less protective than most states

Contributory negligence makes bicycle cases extremely challenging

Last clear chance doctrine is the primary exception available to cyclists

Ohio Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Ohio Rev. Code §2315.33)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Ohio Rev. Code §2305.10)

Ohio Rev. Code §4511.27 — Safe passing distance required (no specific footage)

No specific footage requirement for passing — 'safe distance' standard

Non-economic damages cap with catastrophic injury exception

Ohio has invested in cycling infrastructure in Columbus and Cleveland metros

Oklahoma Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Okla. Stat. §23-13)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (Okla. Stat. §12-95)

Okla. Stat. §47-11-1208 — 3-foot minimum passing distance

3-foot passing law applies statewide

Non-economic damages capped at $350K — limits recovery for severe injuries

Limited cycling infrastructure outside university communities

Oregon Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (ORS §31.600)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (ORS §12.110)

ORS §811.490 — Anti-dooring statute: illegal to open door into traffic when unsafe

ORS §814.430 — Cyclists exempted from using bike lanes in certain conditions

ORS §811.065 — Drivers must give cyclists safe passing distance

Oregon has one of the strongest anti-dooring laws in the country

Portland consistently ranks as one of America's most bike-friendly cities

Oregon allows cyclists to ride on sidewalks (except in downtown Portland CBD)

South Carolina Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (S.C. Code §15-38-15)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (S.C. Code §15-3-530)

S.C. Code §56-5-3435 — 3-foot minimum passing distance (2008 law)

3-foot passing law enacted 2008

No mandatory helmet law for adult cyclists

Coastal areas have seasonal tourist cycling traffic

Tennessee Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Tenn. Code §29-11-103)

Statute of Limitations: 1 year from date of accident (Tenn. Code §28-3-104) — SECOND SHORTEST in the nation

Tenn. Code §55-8-175 — 3-foot minimum passing distance

Tenn. Code §55-52-105 — Cyclists have same rights as motorists

1-YEAR SOL — file immediately after bicycle crash

3-foot passing law provides clear negligence standard

Nashville's growing cycling infrastructure increases rider volume and conflicts

Utah Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (Utah Code §78B-5-818)

Statute of Limitations: 4 years from date of accident (Utah Code §78B-2-307)

Utah Code §41-6a-706.5 — 3-foot minimum passing distance

Utah Code §41-6a-1115 — Cyclist rights and duties

3-foot passing law applies statewide

Salt Lake City has growing protected bike lane network

Mountain cycling routes create unique hazards

Washington Laws

Negligence System: Pure Comparative Negligence (RCW §4.22.005)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (RCW §4.16.080)

RCW §46.61.110 — Drivers must maintain safe distance when passing cyclists

RCW §46.61.755 — Cyclists have same rights and duties as motorists

RCW §46.61.780 — Bicycle helmets required for riders under 16

No statewide mandatory 3-ft passing distance — 'safe distance' standard

Seattle has extensive protected bike lane network and Vision Zero commitment

King County has local ordinances requiring helmets for all ages

West Virginia Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar (W. Va. Code §55-7-13a)

Statute of Limitations: 2 years from date of accident (W. Va. Code §55-2-12)

W. Va. Code §17C-7-3 — Safe passing distance required

No specific footage passing requirement — 'safe distance' standard

Mountainous terrain creates challenging cycling conditions

No mandatory helmet law for any age

Wisconsin Laws

Negligence System: Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar (Wis. Stat. §895.045)

Statute of Limitations: 3 years from date of accident (Wis. Stat. §893.54)

Wis. Stat. §346.075 — 3-foot minimum passing distance

3-foot passing law applies statewide

Madison is one of the most bike-friendly cities in the Midwest

Short cycling season concentrates accidents into May–September

* State laws change frequently. Information current as of February 2026. This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contact Bond Legal at (866) 423-7724 for a free case evaluation specific to your state and circumstances.

Step-by-Step Guide

What To Do Right Now

Move to safety and call 911

Get out of the roadway if possible. Call 911 even for seemingly minor injuries — adrenaline masks pain, and head injuries are common in bicycle crashes.

Document the scene and vehicle

Photograph the car (especially the door if dooring), your bicycle damage, road conditions, bike lane markings, and your injuries. Get the driver's insurance and license info.

Preserve your helmet

If your helmet is cracked or damaged, DO NOT throw it away. Helmet damage is powerful evidence of impact force and can prove head injury severity.

Seek immediate medical evaluation

Get imaging for head, neck, and internal injuries within 24 hours. Many cycling injuries — especially TBI and internal bleeding — are not immediately apparent.

Do not accept blame

Drivers and their insurers often blame cyclists for not wearing reflective clothing, riding without lights, or 'swerving.' These are often unfounded and don't eliminate driver liability.

Contact Bond Legal

We understand the nuances of bicycle law, e-bike classifications, and dooring liability in your state. Free consultation at (866) 423-7724.

Without an Attorney vs. With Bond Legal

See why hiring an attorney makes all the difference.

Without an Attorney

✗Insurer blames you for 'riding in traffic'
✗E-bike classification confusion used to deny claims
✗Helmet use (or non-use) used to reduce compensation
✗Quick settlement before TBI symptoms fully manifest

With Bond Legal

We establish the driver's duty of care and prove negligence
We navigate your state's e-bike classifications to protect your rights
We counter helmet arguments with your state's actual helmet requirements
We can recommend neurological evaluation to document injury extent

Types of Injuries & Damages

Traumatic Brain Injuries

The leading cause of cyclist fatalities, even with helmet use. Impact biomechanics include coup-contrecoup injury from primary vehicle strike and secondary ground contact, producing concussions (graded by the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool — SCAT6), subdural and epidural hematomas, and diffuse axonal injury (DAI) visible on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Helmet crack-pattern analysis and accelerometer data quantify peak g-forces to correlate with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores at presentation.

Facial & Dental Injuries

Le Fort fractures (Types I-III), orbital blowout fractures, mandibular fractures, and avulsed dentition are common in unprotected cyclist impacts. Treatment often requires maxillofacial surgical reconstruction, dental implantation, and rhinoplasty, with future costs documented through prosthetic life-cycle cost projections.

Clavicle & Shoulder Fractures

The instinctive FOOSH (fall on outstretched hand) mechanism causes midshaft clavicle fractures (Allman classification), acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations (Rockwood Types I-VI), and rotator cuff tears confirmed on MRI arthrography. Surgical fixation with plate osteosynthesis may be required, with residual loss of shoulder range of motion documented by goniometric measurement for impairment rating under the AMA Guides.

Road Rash & Skin Grafts

Friction abrasions classified by depth — first-degree (epidermal), second-degree (partial-thickness dermal), and third-degree (full-thickness) — may require serial debridement, negative-pressure wound therapy (VAC), and split-thickness or full-thickness skin grafting. Permanent scarring is valued using the observer scar assessment scale (OSAS) and photographic documentation for disfigurement damages.

Spinal Injuries

Vehicular impact forces on unprotected cyclists cause vertebral burst fractures (Denis classification), traumatic disc herniations confirmed on MRI with T2-weighted sagittal sequences, and spinal cord contusion graded on the ASIA Impairment Scale (A-E). Thoracolumbar junction injuries (T11-L2) are particularly common due to the cyclist's flexed riding posture at impact.

Common Cases We Handle

Dooring accidents (anti-dooring statute violations)
Right-hook collisions at intersections
E-bike accidents involving classification disputes
Cyclist struck by distracted or turning driver
Bike lane intrusion collisions
Hit-and-run bicycle accidents
Road hazard accidents (potholes, debris)
Group ride and cycling event accidents

Why Choose Bond Legal

Deep knowledge of e-bike classification laws across all 50 states
Experience with dooring cases under state anti-dooring statutes
Accident reconstruction experts focusing on cyclist collisions
Understanding of comparative negligence in cycling cases
No attorney fees unless we win

Your Legal Journey

Our Proven Process

Free Case Evaluation

We assess your accident, determine applicable e-bike regulations in your state, and identify all liable parties.

Evidence Preservation

We obtain traffic and surveillance footage, preserve your bicycle and helmet, and document the scene.

Medical Coordination

We connect you with neurologists, orthopedists, and other specialists to document the full extent of injuries.

Liability Analysis

We analyze traffic code violations, e-bike classifications, and driver negligence under your state's laws.

Demand & Resolution

Once we determine your case is viable, we negotiate diligently with all applicable insurers and file suit if necessary.

Frequently Asked Questions

In-Depth Legal Guides

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident Guides by State

Explore our comprehensive state-specific guides covering local laws, filing deadlines, insurance rules, and step-by-step claims processes.

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in California

Legal guide — 2 years from date of injury SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Texas

Legal guide — 2 years from date of injury SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Alabama

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Arkansas

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Colorado

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Florida

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Georgia

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Hawaii

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Illinois

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Iowa

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Louisiana

Legal guide — 1 year SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Michigan

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Minnesota

Legal guide — 6 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Mississippi

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Missouri

Legal guide — 5 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Montana

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in New Mexico

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in New York

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in North Carolina

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Ohio

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Oklahoma

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Oregon

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in South Carolina

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Tennessee

Legal guide — 1 year SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Utah

Legal guide — 4 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Washington

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in West Virginia

Legal guide — 2 years SOL

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident in Wisconsin

Legal guide — 3 years SOL

View All Legal Guides

Injured? Find Out What You're Owed.

You pay nothing unless we win. Contact Bond Legal now and let us advocate for you.

Call Now — It's Free Submit Your Case Online

Other Practice Areas

Auto Accident Attorneys

Injured in a car accident? Bond Legal auto accident attorneys pursue full and fair compensation. Free case review — pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Call 24/7.

Learn More

Truck Accident Lawyers

Seriously injured in a truck accident? Bond Legal handles 18-wheeler and commercial vehicle cases nationwide. We take on trucking companies. Free consultation.

Learn More

Motorcycle Accident Attorneys

Injured in a motorcycle crash? Bond Legal challenges rider bias and pursues full compensation for motorcyclists. Free case review — pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you.

Learn More

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. All case results shown are gross amounts recovered before deduction of attorney fees, costs, and expenses. Net amounts to the client may be less. The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its own merits. Responsible Attorney: Candice Bond, 17500 Red Hill Ave. #100, Irvine, CA 92614. Pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you.

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident Lawyers

Overview

Types of Cases We Handle

Dooring Accidents

Dooring Accidents

Right-Hook Collisions at Intersections

Right-Hook Collisions at Intersections

E-Bike Classification & Liability

E-Bike Classification & Liability

E-Bike Accident Injury Severity

E-Bike Accident Injury Severity

Safe Passing Distance Laws & Driver Duties

Safe Passing Distance Laws & Driver Duties

DUI Drivers & Bicycle Accidents

DUI Drivers & Bicycle Accidents

State-by-State Legal Guide

What To Do Right Now

Move to safety and call 911

Document the scene and vehicle

Preserve your helmet

Seek immediate medical evaluation

Do not accept blame

Contact Bond Legal

Without an Attorney vs. With Bond Legal

Without an Attorney

With Bond Legal

Types of Injuries & Damages

Traumatic Brain Injuries

Facial & Dental Injuries

Clavicle & Shoulder Fractures

Road Rash & Skin Grafts

Spinal Injuries

Common Cases We Handle

Why Choose Bond Legal

Our Proven Process

Free Case Evaluation

Evidence Preservation

Medical Coordination

Liability Analysis

Demand & Resolution

Frequently Asked Questions

How do e-bike classification laws affect my accident case?

What is a dooring accident and who is liable?

Do I have to wear a helmet while cycling?

Bicycle & E-Bike Accident Guides by State

Injured? Find Out What You're Owed.

Other Practice Areas

Auto Accident Attorneys

Truck Accident Lawyers

Motorcycle Accident Attorneys